Cisco 6807 standby supervisor stuck in in issu_negotiation_late Networking |
- Cisco 6807 standby supervisor stuck in in issu_negotiation_late
- Suggestion on WAF
- Nexus 5596 MTU config problem
- Why do ISPs still use PPPoATM or PPPoE instead of 802.1x?
- Alternative PNT: Orolia SecureSync with STL Option?
| Cisco 6807 standby supervisor stuck in in issu_negotiation_late Posted: 25 Feb 2022 05:01 AM PST I replaced the standby sup with a new one and configured the VSS configuration and VSL links but when I do show switch virtual redundancy, the standby mode is stuck in progress to standby issu_negotiation_late Any idea how to fix this? [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 25 Feb 2022 03:59 AM PST Hi Folks, As the title speak for itself, I am looking for WAF solution to secure internet facing servers. Servers are currently behind NAT in DMZ and there is no reverse proxy at the moment. Basically, WAF should all the features required to protect servers from attackers. I am considering two solutions F5 BIG-IP and Cloudflare Can anyone give suggestion based on experience or what solution can best fit in ? [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 25 Feb 2022 12:09 AM PST Heyho, I have 3 of these Switches. 2 of them are in a vpc and the other is just attached. The cores in the VPC have FEXes attached. [N2K-C2232TM-E-10GE and N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE also some without "E"] i know that the Nexus 5k series doesn't support per port MTU config. so i tried: reagardless of this config i get 2 different results by reviewing the config:sh int eth1/3 shows: show queuing interface ethernet 1/3 results in: It lets me only pass a 1500 bytes Packet thouth any port. Any idea how i could get the higher MTU to work? [link] [comments] |
| Why do ISPs still use PPPoATM or PPPoE instead of 802.1x? Posted: 25 Feb 2022 07:18 AM PST Hey friends, how are you doing. I have worked for some years for 2 different ISPs but now there is a question raising in my head that i can't answer. For a lot of connections we were still using PPPoE or PPPoATM like for serial connections, DSL connections, and sometimes even for fiber or Ethernet connections. But why do companies or ISPs still use it? As it's considered as very insecure due to the MD5 hashing which can be cracked in a few minutes without any issues. 802.1x offers Layer 2 authentication as well, so in my opinion it should be possible to use 802.1x with radius in order to provide authentication for DSL, Ethernet or other kinds of connections as well. Am i wrong, or does someone have an explanation why ISPs don't use 802.1X on PE/CE? Or do they still use PPP because they "always did so". I'm curious about your replies. Thanks in advance! [link] [comments] |
| Alternative PNT: Orolia SecureSync with STL Option? Posted: 24 Feb 2022 11:02 PM PST I'm looking for feedback and pricing from anyone that is using an Orolia SecureSync server with STL instead of GPS. STL is a much stronger signal and able to be used with indoor antennas, but requires a subscription to Iridium. Curious to see if it would be a good fit for my lab. Important detail: My lab has limited views of the sky. GPS is not practical for my use case. I want a local stratum 1 time server. [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Enterprise Networking Design, Support, and Discussion. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment