Routing solution for combining 3 ISPs. Networking |
| Routing solution for combining 3 ISPs. Posted: 05 Jun 2022 01:17 PM PDT The diagram is still in the works but i think i have most of it down. We're combining 3 ISPs and splitting them into 2 physical locations (active/passive). Currently, we're using 1 isp to go in, 1 isp to go out, and another isp is to a remote dc independent from the other too (it's a mess!). Aside from the remote dc, the setup has been like this for more than a decade. No one wants to dramatically change things for the usual reasons: cost, complexity, lack of personnel. Does my diagram make sense ? Particularly the parts where the ISPs go in to SW1-2 and RTR 1-2. So I'll have 3x WAN links going into a switch, which will then split those into 2 routers (active/passive), etc. Is the redundancy too little/much? Do I need 1 router per ISP? How are enterprises with multiple ISPs usually designed (with redundancy)? [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 05 Jun 2022 12:58 PM PDT I was wondering how many of you use a backpack for work. If you use one - which one? Pros / cons? Much appreciated, cheers! [link] [comments] |
| Cisco ASA Multiple Context migration to SRX4100 Posted: 05 Jun 2022 08:13 AM PDT Hello, I am migrating a Cisco ASA multiple context where there is a shared interface in the design and they are doing packet classification. I am trying to find out if SRX supports their setup to have a shared physical interface between two vSYS but I am not able to find this. It is showing on ScreenOS and not SRX in the documentation. Is there any way on SRX to do this or any workaround? [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Enterprise Networking Design, Support, and Discussion. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment