Android Help Firefox for Android 90.0, See All New Features, Updates and Fixes |
- Firefox for Android 90.0, See All New Features, Updates and Fixes
- XCOM 2 is officially released!
- Android Game Development Extension is now available to all Android game developers
- Voices of Galaxy: Meet the developers working for open and unique Galaxy experiences (Possible Z Fold3 and Galaxy Watch4 glimpse timestamped)
- Honor Global Press Conference 2021.08.12 - OnLeaks
- Mobvoi wants to give you a free TicWatch E3 for basically just using it
- Why are 'budget' processors still a thing?
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 TENAA listing with some specifications
- ZTE Axon 30 real life photo - Digital Chat Station
- Introducing the Android Game Development Kit | Android Developers
- [Android Central] The TRUTH about Android Security: Does it still suck?
| Firefox for Android 90.0, See All New Features, Updates and Fixes Posted: 13 Jul 2021 07:10 PM PDT
 | ||
| XCOM 2 is officially released! Posted: 13 Jul 2021 03:20 AM PDT
 | ||
| Android Game Development Extension is now available to all Android game developers Posted: 13 Jul 2021 09:30 PM PDT
 | ||
| Posted: 13 Jul 2021 07:57 AM PDT
 | ||
| Honor Global Press Conference 2021.08.12 - OnLeaks Posted: 13 Jul 2021 08:09 AM PDT
 | ||
| Mobvoi wants to give you a free TicWatch E3 for basically just using it Posted: 13 Jul 2021 09:43 PM PDT
 | ||
| Why are 'budget' processors still a thing? Posted: 13 Jul 2021 06:11 AM PDT I stumbled across a topic on r/emulationonandroid asking about what games a Snapdragon 480 device could handle, and it got me thinking... why do we even have this processor line (and others like it)? Surely we could keep creating 'budget-friendly' devices by continuing to produce the flagship processors from previous years? This would reduce costs for the manufacturer since no R&D is necessary for an existing chip, as well as reduce costs for the end user since the device would no longer be top-of-the-line. I'd have thought this would also improve system updates as well since manufacturers would no longer need to optimise them for so many different specs. Basically everyone would be getting much better value for money and having better experiences with their devices, which manufacturers could be using to try and increase a consumer's brand loyalty. The only reason I can see as to why we don't do this already is that consumer's wouldn't need to upgrade their devices so regularly (I say this as someone still rocking a Pixel 2XL because it still performs more than adequately). Is this literally it, or is there some other reason I'm missing, because I really can't understand why the market is still saturated with so many basic devices under the 'budget-friendly' badge. [link] [comments]  | ||
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 TENAA listing with some specifications Posted: 13 Jul 2021 08:30 AM PDT Primary source (currently broken) - anyone have any idea why it's down? [link] [comments]  | ||
| ZTE Axon 30 real life photo - Digital Chat Station Posted: 13 Jul 2021 08:05 AM PDT Source (mobile link since desktop requires sign in) We're looking at an alleged 400PPI UPC (under panel camera) [link] [comments]  | ||
| Introducing the Android Game Development Kit | Android Developers Posted: 13 Jul 2021 12:19 AM PDT
 | ||
| [Android Central] The TRUTH about Android Security: Does it still suck? Posted: 13 Jul 2021 06:05 AM PDT
 |
![[Android Central] The TRUTH about Android Security: Does it still suck?](https://external-preview.redd.it/Rs36f4x12F2O1tREHBFezg340WkoFduGqwYfuvj8Osk.jpg?width=320&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=ca83011814135254285f5335b75649e5f114322b "[Android Central] The TRUTH about Android Security: Does it still suck?")
| You are subscribed to email updates from Android. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment